Originally Posted by hendrix
well, I think so.
I'm also of the opinion that restricting bilateral LO series to 3 t20s, 3 ODIs only would be the best for the game.
Noone cares about meaningless t20s and ODIs.
NO... you are overall in the minority. I'm sure there's a lot less viewership for tests than there is for limited overs cricket.
Originally Posted by Agent Nationaux
4 Tests, 3 ODI's and 1 T20 should be the format ideally.
nobody wants to watch one-sided thrashings...like SA v NZ (that tour should have had more ODIs and T20s as it turned out).
when a side like WI goes abroad, it should be 2 tests as it is normally, and when they play at home it should be 3 tests as is the case these days.
when India of now goes to places like Aus, SA, a test series shouldn't be more than 3 tests.
when it is NZ vs WI, have 4 Tests.
Ideally, there should be more competitive cricket.
Aus vs SL
SA vs NZ
India playing 4/5 tests Overseas
Those game are effectively over inside a day, if not in a couple of sessions.
This is not TEST cricket.