View Single Post
Old 12-01-2013, 07:26 PM   #306 (permalink)
silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
 
silentstriker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 36,550
Yup, I stand by post about the NRA being different from other lobbyist organization. This is not some fringe special interest group dictating policy. This is reflective of the will of the people - it's a very grass roots thing.

EDIT: It was a post in the other thread, but it makes sense here. It was in response to a question about how much power the NRA has.

http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/off-...lt#post2979553

Quote:
Originally Posted by silentstriker View Post
So in the late 1960s, Congress passed the Gun Control Act. NRA really got going after that. It was looking for a while that we would end up with extremely strict gun control laws.

In 1986, they Firearms Owners Protection Act - which really pulled a lot of teeth from the Gun Control Act.

They had some defeats in the 90s - with several gun control laws passed including the assault weapons ban.

In 2004, despite George Bush saying he would extend it, they launched a massive lobbying campaign and the law lapsed.

Next year, they passed a law that stops people who make and sell guns from being sued if someone uses their weapons. After that, they passed law making sure the government can't take your guns away during a natural disaster. You can now carry guns in American national parks - this law was passed despite massive democrat majorities in both houses AND President Obama in office (he didn't want to take on the NRA because it would endanger his credit card reforms).

Not one gun control legislation has passed Congress since the 90s, including when Democrats had almost 60 senators and a huge majority in the House.

However, to see the real changes, you have to look locally - as I said they are different than other lobbies because they have support of a lot of average people, which means they can be local, and vocal, in their lobbying. They can mobilize their members and go door to door in addition to flooding the town with ads. Politicians don't like ads against them, but what they like even less is people in their constituency (not protesters bussed in from other places) demonstrating by the hundreds against them and giving free press to the opposition.

Check this out. In 1986, only 9 states had laws that issued concealed carry licences on a 'no restriction' or 'shall issue' basis. No restriction means obviously no licence needed and shall issue would be that there would only be a few specific instances where it could be denied and the local authorities had no say in who couldn't. 16 states had NO laws granting an ability to carry a concealed weapon.

Fast forward right now: 41 states have 'no restriction' or 'shall issue basis'.



Yup, you went from 9 states to 41 states which pretty much have unlimited concealed carry laws. And the 16 which prohibited it completely? That's down to 1. That's right. 1.


There used to be a serious conversation about banning all handguns in the country. Now it's doubtful if even a semi-automatic assault rifle can be banned.

If you don't call that dominating the field, I don't know what qualifies.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
"The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
-My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

How the Universe came from nothing

Last edited by silentstriker; 12-01-2013 at 07:32 PM.
silentstriker is offline   Reply With Quote