Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfertang
Great champion of the old 'uns that I usually am I do think Faulkner is a tad over-rated round these parts - through no fault of his own he only played 12 of his 25 Tests against full strength opposition so, fine player that he undoubtedly was, I'm going to go for Mike Procter again - best all rounder the game has seen, through my rose-tinted glasses anyway
|
This is a very interesting proposition. I was tempting a choice of S. Pollock here, but it seems Procter might even be the better batsman.