|
By all accounts it's a geographical, political and economic nightmare and NATO countries aren't exactly free-spending at the moment.
I'm definitely not convinced they should anyway. Humanitarian intervention is morally dubious, creates extremely uncertain outcomes and, as humanitarian action goes, is absurdly cost-inefficient. If it's very much in NATO's interests to go in then fine, but they definitely shouldn't go in on a 'it's the right thing to do' ticket. There's a lot of less ambiguously 'right things to do' that those resources could go on.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by zaremba
The Filth have comfortably the better bowling. But the Gash have the batting. Might be quite good to watch.
|
|