|
Na that's just not true re Watson. He is an attacking batsman, but he isn't Gilchrist. Most of his 50's have come at SRs around 50-70, which means the vast mjaority of time he has seen off the new ball. I am probably in a minority (maybe with you here) but I I didn't have much of a problem with Watson being a consistent 50 and out player. The only problem was he hasn't been able to maintain it. If he could have kept his average above 40 doing it, I wouldn't think much of it.
|