Originally Posted by thesearethe11
James, oh please, don't think of changing the format.. I totally disagree on the suggestions above. What's the fun in having static teams? It's important to follow the schedule and change players accordingly so it's dynamic. It's addictive and it is everyday fun. If I have just one team and if the guy is not doing well, why would I want to stick with that guy? Also having changes help catching up with others as one can come up with different strategies. Please don't make teams static and if you do so, I strongly believe that will be end of cricweb fantasy.
Some suggestions though, there are too many transfers available for a small tournament. Also captain changes should be free. That will let people to come up with different picks towards the end to catch up with others. I don't understand the reason on why having these impositions so teams stay static. Just my 2c.
Thanks for throwing that in. I think if we're to go with the suggestion, we'd offer two competitions, one with modifications and one without and people can join whichever one they'd prefer to be apart of.
And yes, no cost captaincy changes would make things interesting.