Originally Posted by G.I.Joe
I didn't. You might not agree with the stance of weighing life differently in accordance with the choices made by a person (or the fact that some are not in position to be afforded that choice), but it nevertheless is a stance that has some grounding as a principle. You chose to respond to the point with a crude generalisation, unless you skipped over it and had mis-quoted.
well of course it was a generalization but there was nothing crude about it...it is true about the current day typical
right wing social conservative in the u.s...and yes i do consider the stance contradictory and sanctimonious/hypocritical with no grounding in any consistent principle...