Cricket Web - View Single Post

Arjun · 25-09-2011, 01:18 AM

Poor Vinay Kumar. He's a 'corrected' replacement for injured Pawan Suyal, despite being a significantly better bowler than Suyal. Maybe the part on fitness-suspect Ishank is genuine, but picking an injured Suyal is silly. It makes the BCCI's stupidity of scheduling it during the CLT20 look smart. This ROI squad, picked with unavailability of top Indian frontline and reserve players in mind, looks weak enough for the Rajasthan side, bolstered with journeymen, to take down. The selection of Rahul Sharma is also very premature, but again forced, though the option of Mishra wasn't explored. The biggest omission, though, is that of Wasim Jaffer.

Umesh-Aaron-Vinay-Ojha-Rahul will be a good attack. The top six, though, is a little weak.

25-09-2011, 01:18 AM	#9 (permalink)
Arjun Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mumbai, India Posts: 7,837	Poor Vinay Kumar. He's a 'corrected' replacement for injured Pawan Suyal, despite being a significantly better bowler than Suyal. Maybe the part on fitness-suspect Ishank is genuine, but picking an injured Suyal is silly. It makes the BCCI's stupidity of scheduling it during the CLT20 look smart. This ROI squad, picked with unavailability of top Indian frontline and reserve players in mind, looks weak enough for the Rajasthan side, bolstered with journeymen, to take down. The selection of Rahul Sharma is also very premature, but again forced, though the option of Mishra wasn't explored. The biggest omission, though, is that of Wasim Jaffer. Umesh-Aaron-Vinay-Ojha-Rahul will be a good attack. The top six, though, is a little weak. __________________ "Talent is nothing without opportunity" "You're not remembered for aiming at the target, but hitting it" Twenty20 used to be boring. Sponsored...by...nothing!!!