Originally Posted by slippyslip
Right, because Safin losing the 1st set 6-1 to Hewitt clearly indicates that Safin was DOMINATING Hewitt.
Facts are your friend, son, you should try them sometime.
Who the **** posts like this?
Seriously, if you're going to engage in a discussion with me don't be a douchebag.
Now on to your point, Hewitt won the first set because Safin was off. But if you watched the whole tournament Hewitt scraped through all tournament (5 settes galore) whereas Safin played as good as he possibly could. After that first set Hewitt didn't get a look in.