View Single Post
Old 04-05-2010, 12:58 PM   #374 (permalink)
Sir Alex
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 4,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
Well you were wrong.

West Indies scored those runs thinking they'd have 20 overs to bat, but they actually only had 6, so they're adjusted to take account of the heightened risk they would've taken had they known. That's why the target was smaller than most thought it'd be. Two overs of going of going at 13s or whatever when the RRR was about 9 means a ****load in a 6-over contest.
DWTA Prince. Unless DL has undergone significant change in the last year with respect to it's core concept, I don't think runs already scored by the chasing team are figured into determining the REVISED TARGET. In other words West indies could have well been 0-0 after 2.2 overs yesterday and they still would have to chase 60 in 6 overs (of course obviously harder task than yesterday's but nothing to do with DL) However had they lost 2 wickets, they'd be chasing 72 afaic.

Would love to be proved wrong, particularly with a 'For Dummies' example.
Sir Alex is offline