Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 106

Thread: Why doesn't FIFA do something about diving/players abusing referees?

  1. #1
    International Coach PhoenixFire's Avatar
    Curveball Champion!
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Bitch please, I'm from West Yorkshire
    Posts
    14,988

    Why doesn't FIFA do something about diving/players abusing referees?

    Serious question here. People will give answers of FIFA being run by a bunch of spineless beaurocrats (which may or may not be true) but they will obviously act in their own interests most of the time.

    It would be so easy to do something about abusing and surrounding the refs in particular. Only allow the captain to approach the referee and yellow card anyone else who does so. It'd quickly stamp out all the ridiculous intimidation of referees that goes on. Why don't they do it? Am I missing something really obvious.

    If football got rid of its reputation of being full of overpaid ****s that dive, cheat and abuse referees, it'd probably have an increased fan-base, so why don't FIFA do it? It'd surely be in their interests...
    Quote Originally Posted by Top_Cat View Post
    1) Had double pneumonia as a kid, as did my twin sis. Doctors told my parents to pray that we lived through the night. Dad said **** off, I'm an atheist, you ****s better save my kids, etc. Then prayed anyway.

  2. #2
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend andyc's Avatar
    Yeti Sports 1.5 Champion!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    23,856
    Yeah agree with the above. I never understand the pestering of the ref anyway; it's clearly not going to change his mind so STFU and cop it on the chin (the players that is, fans more than welcome to bitch about it). Would love to see simulation as a straight red as well. Would leave too much up to the ref's interpretation as a dive though, so can't exactly see it happening.
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Only a bunch of convicts having been beaten 3-0 and gone 9 tests without a win and won just 1 in 11 against England could go into the home series saying they will win. England will win in Australia again this winter as they are a better side which they have shown this summer. 3-0 doesn't lie girls.

  3. #3
    Cricket Web Staff Member Burgey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Castle
    Posts
    41,552
    Quote Originally Posted by andyc View Post
    Yeah agree with the above. I never understand the pestering of the ref anyway; it's clearly not going to change his mind so STFU and cop it on the chin (the players that is, fans more than welcome to bitch about it). Would love to see simulation as a straight red as well. Would leave too much up to the ref's interpretation as a dive though, so can't exactly see it happening.
    This.

    Straight red for diving.

    Moreover, for diving they should have a review system where a panel looks at the game even if no foul for it was given. If the panel spots a player has dived, give him a one or two match ban.

    Would only have to do it once or twice, the world would shift.
    WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
    "People make me happy.. not places.. people"

    "When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson

    "Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn

  4. #4
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,866
    1. Straight red for diving.
    2. Any time a player clutches a body part in pain or makes any show of injury (e.g, isn't up immediately), he has to leave the field for five minutes (a sub comes in). If the injury is real, they need the time.
    3. Even if the ref doesn't see it, or doesn't think its a dive during live play, the player gets a two game suspension from the authorities after the game for dives


    I was disgusted by that Italy-NZ game. I'd dive too and encourage my players to do so - there's virtually no downside. But if I were an administrator, I'd clamp down pretty severely on that stuff. No one likes it, it adds nothing and in fact hurts the sport severely.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
    Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
    "The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
    -My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

    How the Universe came from nothing


  5. #5
    Hall of Fame Member Son Of Coco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    17,227
    I'd add that if he gets hit by a limb/the ball/a leaf blowing across the ground and falls to the ground writhing in agony clutching the wrong body part (i.e. the leaf hits him on the arm and he falls down clutching his head) then it's a month out of the game and he has to front a press conference where he's shown the offending footage and then asked to explain himself.

    Anything less than a 10 sentence answer and he has to sit there until he's done a good enough job.

    It is funny though that for all the promises of 'cracking down on diving' etc etc everything stays the same. How referees aren't dubious about the likes of a De Rossi by now is beyond comprehension.
    Last edited by Son Of Coco; 20-06-2010 at 08:26 PM.
    "What is this what is this who is this guy shouting what is this going on in here?" - CP. (re: psxpro)

    R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best

    R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi

    Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath

    "How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.

  6. #6
    cpr
    cpr is offline
    International Coach cpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    10,025
    You new world lot with your modern foward looking sports and general rational thought to improving things.

    The laws were made in the 19th Century for a reason, and just because johnny foreigner doesnt want to play fair, no use bally well changing the rules because of him........




    That may or may not be an actual quote from the FIFA council. The best analogy I can think off is that if FIFA ran cricket then tests would still be timeless and the only limited overs matches would be where the away team has to sail home before a result can be decided......
    "All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
    Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
    GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
    Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
    Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers

  7. #7
    Hall of Fame Member Johnners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,050
    Don't particularly mind players going to ground easy, as in the vast majority cases there is a foul. Sure it might be "soft" but meh, if what you're doing is essentially wrong, don't really have a legit reason to complain imo (have learnt this the hard one, thanks Lucas ). But if there was any way to get rid of all the play acting whereby you'd think the players had been stabbed in the face or had their leg sawn off by the way they're grasping it, I'm all for it. I guess though, it's gotten to the point where if you have one, the other is guaranteed to happen, and really the only effective way to stop it now is by the use of a review panel after the game. I like how football doesn't have stoppages for video reviews on every other decision made by a ref (goals/penalties aside)

    Re: the Italy/NZ game, sure the Italians were making a meal of it, but imo Fallon in particular was somewhat lucky to have only been given a yellow after about his 3rd elbow/forearm to the face/throat of Chiellini/Cannavaro.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Mitch Johnson is ****ing awesome for cricket.
    Quote Originally Posted by pasag View Post
    Ponting's ability to ton up in the first innings of a series should not be understated. So much pressure, so important. What a great!

  8. #8
    Global Moderator Somerset's Avatar
    Money Money Money Champion! Tournaments Won: 7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    9,863
    Agree with the first post. I think rugby union's a step ahead in terms of communication with the referee and backchat from players. Essentially any abuse of the referee is an instant penalty, or an instant 10 metre advance of the mark if a penalty was already awarded. The large majority of referees demand for players to go through their captain if they want to discuss an aspect of his ruling. Bit difficult to compare the two sports with respect to diving because its essentially play on in rugby, but I the opening post makes a valid point - and IMO penalising the diving players is surely the way forward to eliminate the simulations.
    Last edited by Somerset; 20-06-2010 at 08:36 PM.

  9. #9
    cpr
    cpr is offline
    International Coach cpr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    10,025
    Fact is, some refs need to grow some balls. They can punish 'simulation', they can ignore the player writhing around, but a prime example is the Kaka red, sent him off based on the reactions he saw, not what he saw (or didnt). A decent ref would've left that one for the review panel (as if he stated in his notes he didnt see it, they could review it if they felt their was a case of violent conduct), rather than going OTT thinking it makes him seem he's in control when it does the opposite.

  10. #10
    Hall of Fame Member Johnners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,050
    Quote Originally Posted by cpr View Post
    Fact is, some refs need to grow some balls. They can punish 'simulation', they can ignore the player writhing around, but a prime example is the Kaka red, sent him off based on the reactions he saw, not what he saw (or didnt). A decent ref would've left that one for the review panel (as if he stated in his notes he didnt see it, they could review it if they felt their was a case of violent conduct), rather than going OTT thinking it makes him seem he's in control when it does the opposite.
    Yeah don't disagree, but I can't see refs suddenly changing how they make their decisions without some sort of chance for support after the fact, or without making them more accountable for mistakes. Given time, i'd like to think that with a review panel, the refs would be more confident in making decisions based on what they see re: the incidents as opposed to the aftermath. Ultimately I think would make both the refs and players more accountable, which can only be a good thing.

    Can't see it happening anytime soon tho'

  11. #11
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,741
    SS's leave the field for five minutes suggestion is flawed, cbf to explain why just now, other than that though everything in the thread makes sense. Agree with Burgey on making it a straight red, I think, though I have seen yellows given when a player has clearly not dived but not been fouled either, and you'd hate to see someone sent off in that situation. But you could say that of most red card offences, I guess.
    Quote Originally Posted by DingDong View Post
    gimh has now surpassed richard as the greatest cw member ever imo

    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  12. #12
    RTDAS pasag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Looking for milksteak
    Posts
    31,678
    There was a moment I think around the 40th minute in the Australia game where two players were fighting hard for the ball, they then start remonstrating and whinging for a free, despite the ball still being in play! It's not just soccer either, most sports these days have become very ugly in this regard, everything centres around the refs and it really detracts from the sport. At least cricket is doing something about it, if you don't like it, refer it, but don't moan and bitch and don't try and cheat because you'll be found out quickly.
    Rest In Peace Craigos
    2003-2012

  13. #13
    State Regular L Trumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    906
    The problem with straight red to diving is it's pretty hard to spot a dive. It might be losing your footing or unexpected soft touch ref can't define it on the spot. Although I love fans moaning though, as if referees can see all the angles when a foul is being made. Only thing is you allow TV replays or not, blamig referees doesn't do much, becuase they keep on doing these mistakes as long as the game is being played.

  14. #14
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,104
    Replays would work for occasions when the ball goes into the net, for referring offsides, fouls in the box etc, but not for open play. You can't just stop the clock and check the video, it's not that kind of sport.
    I know a place where a royal flush
    Can never beat a pair

  15. #15
    International Vice-Captain Noble One's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,113
    My biggest gripe with football is the treatment of referees.

    What is the point of arguing your case to the referee? The decision is made (right or wrong) and you just need to move on. Coaches and players should have the right upon completion of the game to air any grievancesí, but not during the contest. The players who shake a finger at the assistant referee when an offside decision is called are the worst. What are they trying to achieve? Challenge the referee for an after match bout behind the stadium upon the completion of the game?

    Like all sports, it is the coaches from junior level upwards who need to stamp this behaviour out.

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ICC vs FIFA
    By Patroclus in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 27-09-2010, 06:36 PM
  2. controversial
    By sledger in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 09-07-2006, 01:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •