pasag
RTDAS
Shounak said:
Shounak said:
As with all throughout the Ashes series, it's in your character to kick people/teams when they're down. Big note yourself. Pretty silent after the goals are scored though. Typical. You're just a one-dimensional Aussie-bashing clown.Scaly piscine said:You're just pathetic
Did you not see some of the agricultural tackles from Australia? Then you've got the big guys up front that they just hoof it up to...
Sounds like Leeds to me
You gormless tit... etc.
Zzzz.
Gotta love an Aussie moaning about kicking people/teams when they're down, I guess you can't take what you dish out eh.howardj said:As with all throughout the Ashes series, it's in your character to kick people/teams when they're down. Big note yourself. Pretty silent after the goals are scored though. Typical.
Yeah the ball followed him, didn't it? Initially I thought his execution was off but he was there or thereabouts and the Japanese coach had to take him seriously, freeing up some space for the others. To use a cricketing analogy, Viduka was the accumulator who batted through the innings, Kennedy the guy who raised the run-rate to make the target possible and Cahill the guy who hit two sixes to win the game.As the SBS guys have said over and over, Kewell should have been on the left at the start and Cahill in the middle, but otherwise Hiddink was genius. Kennedy is a perfect option off the bench and was the catalyst for most of our later moves, and Cahill was obviously superb with his finishes.
Agreed. And Guus Hiddink = e.Top_Cat said:Tim Cahill = h.
Indeed. I don't know how many people watched Australia v Liechtenstein, but Kennedy showed his class in that game off the bench, and as soon as I saw him I thought he was a perfect option for the WC. He's got great presence and he's a brilliant target man, and in the air he's absolutely lethal, though he didn't show it so much tonight.Top_Cat said:Yeah the ball followed him, didn't it? Initially I thought his execution was off but he was there or thereabouts and the Japanese coach had to take him seriously, freeing up some space for the others. To use a cricketing analogy, Viduka was the accumulator who batted through the innings, Kennedy the guy who raised the run-rate to make the target possible and Cahill the guy who hit two sixes to win the game.
Tim Cahill = h.
Agree with your first analysis, but perhaps the second ('h') is some really strong form of agreement or approval, a bit like the old Vulcan Mind-meld (after all, chris.hinton and C_C seem to both have certain outlandish beliefs, although not necessarily the same ones)benchmark00 said:Surely 'e' has to be a derogatory term, seeing as it was in reference to Zimbabwe cricket.
Maybe 'h' is as well, considering it was posted directly after a C_C post...
I retract my 'Guus Hiddink = e' comment in that case. He can be some other form of 'h' perhaps.benchmark00 said:Surely 'e' has to be a derogatory term, seeing as it was in reference to Zimbabwe cricket.
Maybe 'h' is as well, considering it was posted directly after a C_C post...