Cricket Web - View Single Post

slippyslip · 10-08-2009, 08:51 PM

Well, considering Flintoff's bowling was poop at Edgbaston Flintoff could only have been considered as batsman. But Flintoff in a team and not bowling would probably be more psychologically damaging than no Flintoff.

Just my theory of course.

10-08-2009, 08:51 PM	#24 (permalink)
slippyslip U19 12th Man Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Sydney Posts: 281	Well, considering Flintoff's bowling was poop at Edgbaston Flintoff could only have been considered as batsman. But Flintoff in a team and not bowling would probably be more psychologically damaging than no Flintoff. Just my theory of course.