View Single Post
Old 22-02-2009, 06:51 PM   #772 (permalink)
aussie
Hall of Fame Member
 
aussie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cricket
Posts: 16,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nnanden View Post
Why is McGain too risky?

As much as I personally don't rate McGain, anything other than

Phil Hughes
Simon Katich
Ricky Ponting
Michael Hussey
Michael Clarke
Marcus North
Brad Haddin
Mitchell Johnson
Peter Siddle
Bryce McGain
Doug Bollinger

would be pretty silly imo. Have posted this same line-up since the middle of the summer aswell.
Picking McGain as part of 4-man attack is risky because the likely 3 seamers aren't a McGrath/Gillespie/Kasper like combo in ability.

All are obviously inexperienced, along with McGain who aint nor Warne or MacGill. So picking such an attack, Australia are definately at a disadvantage to SA batsmen. Its going to another repeat of the home series, since thats not learning from the mistakes that where made with the bowling selections.

I have said it many times, but 4-seamers is the best balance for the 1st test. I'd love to see McGain start, but overall its not the best option.

If After the 1st test though, as Ponting wisely said the other day. The quicks step up like how McGrath, Reifell, Juilian stepped up in 95 & surprise the saffies, then throw McGain into the action.
aussie is offline   Reply With Quote