Originally Posted by pasag
Read the posts again please, specifically the part where I called him a superb player then go back and show me where I said again and again 'Styen is not a good enough bowler'. The perhaps you'll realise this thread is asking where the number one bolwer in the world relates to previous number ones. Whether he is better then some, worse than others etc.
The question is, why do you think Steyn would struggle to be among the best bowlers during any other period in cricket history??