Originally Posted by dontcloseyoureyes
Who said Steyn was poor? Some people are totally missing the point of this thread.
Harmison was never the best paceman in the world. His peak was during McGrath's reign. Rankings are meaningless in this debate.
If rankings are meaningless, what is the meaningful argument then? Perceptions? Because the other indicator, statistics, show Steyn to be as good as any fast bowler in any decade.