View Single Post
Old 23-11-2008, 04:28 PM   #34 (permalink)
Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Umm... so it'd have been fair for England to have 17 out of 22 overs as Powerplay when they knew they only had 22 overs to face?

No.

India played their Powerplays as if they were batting 50 (or for 3 overs' worth, 43) overs. That's completely different to knowing that Powerplay will be in force for the vast majority of your innings.

Mind, given that England's batsmen performed infinitely better in the just-concluded game with non-Powerplay in place than Powerplay, such an outcome might well have seen England knocked-over far more cheaply than they were.
__________________
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
Quote:
chris.hinton: h
FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote