View Single Post
Old 05-12-2007, 10:45 AM   #12 (permalink)
shortpitched713
International Regular
 
shortpitched713's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 3,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Yeah, he himself said it was not a decision he'd have taken again, and reckons that had he let Hick get the century it'd have improved the mood in the camp and maybe helped win the game which they ended-up just failing to.

Hick did not speak to him for the rest of the tour. And yeah, it was 1994\95, Atherton's only Ashes tour as captain.
Wow, pretty selfish on his part, I would think. Its his duty and responsibility as a professional cricketer to accept the decisions his captain makes to help England win, and personally I don't care if he was on 399*, he should be willing to leave whenever it would benefit his country. Such behavior would be a bit of a black mark on the legacy of any cricketer, one would think.
__________________
Proud 2nd member of GM-OLAS
Honorary Assistant Vice-President and Inquisitor General of T2IBS (Twenty-20 is Boring Society)

Fraz highlights the defining aspect of Shoaib's legacy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRAZ View Post
Those humanitarian works etc ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by andruid View Post
I feel Tendulkar's association with the money minting exploitation of cricket fandom by certain varying commercial interests tarnishes his greatness a tad.
shortpitched713 is offline   Reply With Quote