Originally Posted by Prince EWS
I really hate it when people do that to prove a point. Without anyone's highest score, their average will be lower - especially if you are talking about averages over a short period. His 203 was against a quality attack and deserves to be recognised. The fact that he was poor without it is fairly irrelevant because he scored it - hence he had a good series.
If he had a good series, he wouldnt not have been dropped in favor of Symonds.
I think when someone scores 203, and then in 5 other innings cant even manage 1/4 of that it suggests that its merely a deviation from the norm.